|
|
This is very disappointing. I was hoping we could have engaged in a sensible and grown up debate without any personal attacks and muck slinging. Perhaps it is too emotive a subject matter and the wounds of Paris are too fresh. Perhaps there is no right time or place to discuss the ever increasing divide which exists between the two cultures in a sensible and tolerant way? Please refrain from making personal attacks.
Sorry redken, but it's not the 1st time we have disagreed on politics (myself and WB) though I believe last time I was simply dismissed as "stupid". I will hold my tongue so as not to mess your thread up further than I have already. If you would like I will edit the text out of my posts just say if you want that.
That's you're freedom of speech fella edit nothing!Originally Posted by WR6133
No point in having any discussions about anything if we feel that we can't express our views freely and if we don't respect opposing views. I was only reminding all contributors that if we end up with a slanging match it would inevitably lead to closure of the debate.
To lighten the mood, here's a link to Bill Mahers Mockumentry Religulous. Its pretty funny. for those of you that haven't seen it - a serious look at religion, using some fun and some experts who are now thinking - 'Its ****ing Mental'
http://youtu.be/E2zhlDbMfDg?t=12s
Very good. Reminds me of Bill Hicks
Watch out or the forum Nazi's will be along to lock this thread.
Freedom of speech is not allowed here
I agree with Georges point of view
Last edited by Swanny; 10-01-15 at 04:20 PM.
LOVE IT!Watch out or the forum Nazi's will be along to lock this thread.
Freedom of speech is not allowed here
I agree with Georges point of view
Twelve members of Islamic State have been left seriously amused after a ruthless gang of satirists forced their way into its headquarters and proceeded to ridicule up the place.
Sarcasm, parody and irony are all said to have been used in what many are seeing as a broader attack on everyone's freedom to stone homosexuals or cut babies in half.
IS employee, Mohammed Adir, was quietly working on ways to interpret ancient religious texts so as to justify beheading schoolgirls when the siege took place.
'One of them had a sketchpad, but that's about all I can remember. I think he was the leader.'
'The rest of them just sat there riffing gags back and forth and taking central tenets of our religious philosophy to their naturally absurd logical conclusions. They must have been planning it for months.' he continued.
Abu Mustafa, an IS freelancer who was busy cutting the still-screaming head off a humanitarian aid worker in Northern Africa when he heard of the attack, considers himself lucky.
'What's the world coming to when you can't go about trying to establish a worldwide caliphate of unchallenged barbaric totalitarianism in peace?'
'I'm just thankful that most of those in the building at the time didn't possess the requisite critical thinking skills to have been affected. Otherwise, who knows how many might have 'got it'.'
Sadly, not everyone was so fortunate; the worst affected being the twelve who were subjected to over forty minutes of humorous, rational observations encouraging healthy skepticism and freedom of thought. Unfortunately, for IS and all its supporters, their condition is now said to be 'critical'.
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
