Notices
 

Thread: Speeding motorway drivers could face £10,000 fines

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1.  
    #11
    Diamond Member Burbler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Brizzle
    Posts
    2,711
    There is a 50 mph average speed reg on the M5 around WsM. I noticed that ALL the cameras face south. So, if you are biking southwards they can get your plate. If you are travelling northwards...they can't.
    I only have one vice…I lie.
     
     

  2.  
    #12
    Active Member WhyNot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Marlborough
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by WR6133 View Post
    If they follow the letter of the law any fine should equal the same financial punishment in terms of proportion to the persons circumstance, so no savings, minimum wage worker should be at the low end of the scale while an investment banker should be at the higher end. That applies now, so if they raised the upper limits unless you are pretty wealthy it should make little difference and if you are that wealthy maybe a more meaningful fine can be imposed.
    Great, so those like me who work hard, pay massive tax per year will have to pay more money to the government.....
     
     

  3.  
    #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    3,804
    Quote Originally Posted by WhyNot View Post
    Great, so those like me who work hard, pay massive tax per year will have to pay more money to the government.....
    That's why your government loves you
     
     

  4.  
    #14
    Platinum Member WR6133's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Tidworth
    Posts
    1,162
    Quote Originally Posted by WhyNot View Post
    Great, so those like me who work hard, pay massive tax per year will have to pay more money to the government.....
    By the letter of the law though (not that it seems to be applied properly) before fining anyone they should take in to account earnings, assets, etc and make any fine proportionate to that so that no matter what your income the hardship caused by the fine should be equal.

    The fine is punishment not revenue generation so why should a poor person be (proportionately to their wealth) punished more than a wealthier person, raising maximum thresholds just evens things up.
     
     

  5.  
    #15
    Active Member WhyNot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Marlborough
    Posts
    177
    Although those on benefits who don't actually earn money still get let off easily because the fine will just be taken out of their weekly beer and fags allowance.....

    Rant over....
     
     

  6.  
    #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    3,804
    Quote Originally Posted by WR6133 View Post
    By the letter of the law though (not that it seems to be applied properly) before fining anyone they should take in to account earnings, assets, etc and make any fine proportionate to that so that no matter what your income the hardship caused by the fine should be equal.

    The fine is punishment not revenue generation so why should a poor person be (proportionately to their wealth) punished more than a wealthier person, raising maximum thresholds just evens things up.
    But large rich corporations don't pay taxes or fines
     
     

  7.  
    #17
    Chatterbox Jon_W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Loacation Loaction
    Posts
    5,133
    Virtually every paragraph contains the words "proposed" or "could".

    Hype. Non story.
    "there's no aspect, no facet, no moment in life that can't be improved with pizza"

     
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •