Notices
 

Thread: Lucky boy

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1.  
    #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    699
    That is scary to watch.

    With the hedge I'm thinking he's only seen the truck a second or so before impact, and looks far to close to centre line as the bike comes into shot, I wonder if had nothing been coming the other way if he would have stayed right side of the road or not.

    Possibly a graphic example of target fixation?

    It looks to me like the left leg is out and foot off peg while the bike is up, before crossing the centre line, as if an instinctive reaction to bail out has kicked in, rather than to tighten up and get round. There are some natural instincts we want to coach out of ourselves.
     
     

  2.  
    #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Studley
    Posts
    522
    Thats a lesson learned. It was a **** bit of riding really. He wasn't even lent over very far and had plenty to tyre left. Immediately locked the front wheel up. He was riding way to close to his mate too. Possibly trying to catch up. I think that accident is a very difficult one to have !!!!
    Counting down until my next ride out!
     
     

  3.  
    #13
    Platinum Member jack930's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Westbury
    Posts
    1,294
    There are 2 new posts since your last visit. (You have read 3 of these posts.)
     
     

  4.  
    #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    3,804
    WTF is a lorryist???
    Last edited by Swanny; 07-02-14 at 07:55 PM.
     
     

  5.  
    #15
    Killer Rat
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Rabb View Post
    Very Lucky Boy!
    The principle is 'outside to inside' he could have made that corner at that speed if he had not 'freaked out' mid corner
    If you watch more experienced bikers they would have darted to the inside track at the mid-point of the bend.
    Brakes on - bike stands up and your going straight on wether you like it or not!!!
    I thought that too. A sharp bend with no limit of observation should mean slowing down and squaring it for faster acceleration out of the corner.

    I really should get rid of my 'L' plates!
     
     

  6.  
    #16
    Diamond Member DC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    2,867
    I thought that was a pothole just coming out of the bend By the way , love all the experts on here !!!
     
     

  7.  
    #17
    Killer Rat
    Guest
    so, if it was the pothole that caused his off...why try and sue the lorry driver? surely he should be suing the highways agency?
     
     

  8.  
    #18
    Diamond Member DC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    2,867
    Yeah suing The lorry driver would be a bit ridiculous , but look at the film again at the point where he starts to lose control and freeze it , when the lorry shunts him back towards that spot and freeze it again , you can clearly see where it started to happen . When a film like that is posted on here some folk are too quick to shout what a knob he should have done this or he should have done that and unless you're actually there or him you wouldn't have any idea what went on , like I said , love those experts !!!
     
     

  9.  
    #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    3,804
    But obviously not a nice person or he wouldn't have tried to blame the lorry driver for what he definitely knew was his own fault. I wonder who he would have tried to blame if there was no one else involved? From my level of expertise it looks like he ignored the chevrons, ran wide because of his excess speed, saw the pothole then ran out of talent


    How did he manage to drop it anyway?? Did he panic and slam on the front brake??
    Last edited by Swanny; 08-02-14 at 12:59 AM.
     
     

  10.  
    #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    904
    Quote Originally Posted by Conehead View Post
    it was dismissed cause of the camera evidence. The plonker did not realise he had a camera.
    Riders need to be aware that the camera is not there just by pure chance - Insurance companies are insisting on them being fitted.
    Next it will start being requested on all vehicles and not long after that vehicles will have them built in.

    Then at scenes of accidents the police will ask for witnesses and find the vehicles behind will all have video evidence
     
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •