Notices
 

Thread: NEWSNIGHT - Paxman vs Brand.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Hybrid View

  1.  
    #1
    Diamond Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,338
    Of course we can all use stats and figures (as I do) to further our particular argument. Tom Chivers takes his view that the status quo is working based on a 200 year comparison, when he says, “But the political system – or, more precisely, the wider human system of society – is working. Wherever you live in the world, the odds are that you will have an easier life than someone born in the same place 200 years ago” IMHO a fifty year comparison will give us a much more accurate yardstick, showing the unfair global wealth distribution and the ever increasing power of large corporations to which Russell refers. Here in the UK, the gap between the rich and poor has widened for the past 20 years. That gap increased every single year under the last Labour (some still call them a socialist party) admin, surely reinforcing Russell’s point about all politicians representing the interests of the large corporations. I don’t believe the “system is working” when The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization estimates that nearly 870million people of the 7.1 billion people in the world, or one in eight, were suffering from chronic under nourishment. And closer to home, according to those working at the coal face,we have seen a 700 per cent rise in the use of food banks in the last couple of years. Revolutions happen because masses of the population feel disenfranchised, disillusioned and marginalized. Fifty years ago people would have laughed at Russell Brand’s comments, saying leave “politics to the politicians” Now we laugh at our politicians and give far more respect to the views of public figures who are not part of the political establishment. Just saying Lol
    Last edited by redken1; 25-10-13 at 09:42 AM.
     
     

  2.  
    #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    3,804
    I don't vote, it only encourages them.
    I agree with Russell that the system is totally corrupt and needs to go.
    Revolution is the only answer but it must be a peaceful one as the system is set up to deal with violence and will win every time.
    How it can happen I have no idea, what it can be replaced with I have no idea but it needs to happen.


    Viva la


    These people only have power because we give it to them. If we ignore them they have no power.
     
     

  3.  
    #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Daddy Cool View Post
    Check this one out too I think Wiltshire builders posted this on here last year ish . I used to think he was a bit of a knob ]
    You used to think I was a bit of a knob?
    Cheers mate! 😂

    Can't believe how well Brand came across and how churlish Paxman looked.
    He really is the voice of his generation.
     
     

  4.  
    #4
    Diamond Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,338
    Quote Originally Posted by wiltshire builders View Post
    You used to think I was a bit of a knob?
    Cheers mate! 

    Can't believe how well Brand came across and how churlish Paxman looked.
    He really is the voice of his generation.
    "Used to"???? Lol only joking

    Paxman has always been compulsive viewing for me with his all guns blazing interviewing technique, nailing politicians and allcomers' arses to the mast. His out of character tentative approach to interviewing Brand reminded me of the playground scenario where the established bully comes up against the new start and meets his match. PMSL
    Last edited by redken1; 25-10-13 at 07:31 PM.
     
     

  5.  
    #5
    Diamond Member DC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    2,867
    To be honest I dont feel that Paxman was phased at all by Brand, in all probability he could only agree with what he was saying when you see what his relationship has been like with politicians over the years. You only have to watch Paxman's interview with Blair to see what he's capable of . I reckon he was steering him to help draw him out...............
     
     

  6.  
    #6
    Diamond Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Daddy Cool View Post
    To be honest I dont feel that Paxman was phased at all by Brand, in all probability he could only agree with what he was saying when you see what his relationship has been like with politicians over the years. You only have to watch Paxman's interview with Blair to see what he's capable of . I reckon he was steering him to help draw him out...............
    Andy, Never thought of it like that and you could be right. Loved Brand's sarcastic remark, "I'm not Michael Howard " with reference to the infamous Newsnight interview with the then Home Secretary. Remember it very well - Paxman at his best. Ave it!!!
     
     

  7.  
    #7
    Diamond Member DC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    2,867
    Quote Originally Posted by wiltshire builders View Post
    You used to think I was a bit of a knob?
    Cheers mate! 

    Can't believe how well Brand came across and how churlish Paxman looked.
    He really is the voice of his generation.

    Crossed wires there WB Used to think Russel brand was a bit of a knob !!!
     
     

  8.  
    #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    3,804
    They sound like idiots

    Last edited by Swanny; 29-10-13 at 10:16 AM.
     
     

  9.  
    #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    3,804
    I haven't listened to this


    Published on 28 Oct 2013

    In a recent diatribe on BBC, Hollywood actor Russell Brand with Jeremy Paxman spoke candidly about his desire to create a "Socialist egalitarian system based on the massive redistribution of wealth and heavy taxation of corporations." In this commentary we question Brand's so called "good intentions" and how qualified he really is to talk about these topics as a multi-millionaire. More importantly, we discuss his connection to the Fabian Socialist magazine the "New Statesman," of which he was co-editing for a week before his senseless speech and call for a revolution on TV.


     
     

  10.  
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Swanny View Post
    They sound like idiots

    I'm shocked.
    It took them 1 minute and 32 secs to mention september 11th! Right wing yanks are normally much quicker than that.
    Luckily most Americans know that Fox news is a pile of crap.
     
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •