Well! I have to agree with Dabz - it was perhaps a bit silly to post the sec 59.
But in my defense, I inherited a keen sense of humour and have always considered WB as 'being amongst friends'. Although this is certainly true of most, it was naive of me to not expect the occasional exception.
As for evidence - the local officer left me in no doubt that he had been 'tipped off' by someone on WB. shame.
This person - if not an officer him/herself - has a good working knowledge of the police service. All I asked - if his/her action was based on his/her idea of integrity, they should have the courage to show the same level of integrity by announcing who they are.
As for harsh treatment for doing something silly, heaven forbid we go down that road. Let him without fault cast the first stone.
Just one more note for Ken, I agree we have to fight to protect our freedom of speech and the freedoms we enjoy in Britain.
BTW.
VOTE HUNAR FOR PRIME MINISTER! ! ! !
