Notices
 

Thread: 'Flagship' blown-out of the water!

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. 'Flagship' blown-out of the water! 
    #1
    Diamond Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,338
    Most of the results for the first-ever elections for crime commissioners in England and Wales are now in.

    The electorate certainly gave the ‘thumbs-down’ to the new £65,000 - £100,000 (depending on population of the area under their control) police commissioners, ‘voting with their feet’ as numerous areas have confirmed turnouts ranging from 13-20%.

    In the wake of this historically low voter turnout, the Electoral Commission described it as "a concern for everyone who cares about democracy."

    No such negative comments from the Tory ‘big-hitters.’ Home Secretary Theresa May said, "The police and crime commissioners are visible, they'll be accessible, they've been elected and crucially they will be accountable to people through the ballot box."

    PM Cameron said, "Yes, they have a mandate and look, the turnout was always going to be low, when you're electing a new post for the first time."

    Hang on a minute, are these not the same people who scream from the rooftops, “No mandate, no mandate!” every time less than 50 per cent of the members of a union vote in favour of industrial action? And are these not the same people who are considering a change in industrial action law to make strikes illegal unless at least half the eligible union members vote in favour?

    This hypocritical government could have spent the £100 million on this fiasco of so called elections on 3,000 police constables instead.
     
     

  2. Re: 'Flagship' blown-out of the water! 
    #2
    Active Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    294
    Quote Originally Posted by monday21
    Most of the results for the first-ever elections for crime commissioners in England and Wales are now in.

    The electorate certainly gave the ‘thumbs-down’ to the new £65,000 - £100,000 (depending on population of the area under their control) police commissioners, ‘voting with their feet’ as numerous areas have confirmed turnouts ranging from 13-20%.

    In the wake of this historically low voter turnout, the Electoral Commission described it as "a concern for everyone who cares about democracy."

    No such negative comments from the Tory ‘big-hitters.’ Home Secretary Theresa May said, "The police and crime commissioners are visible, they'll be accessible, they've been elected and crucially they will be accountable to people through the ballot box."

    PM Cameron said, "Yes, they have a mandate and look, the turnout was always going to be low, when you're electing a new post for the first time."

    Hang on a minute, are these not the same people who scream from the rooftops, “No mandate, no mandate!” every time less than 50 per cent of the members of a union vote in favour of industrial action? And are these not the same people who are considering a change in industrial action law to make strikes illegal unless at least half the eligible union members vote in favour?

    This hypocritical government could have spent the £100 million on this fiasco of so called elections on 3,000 police constables instead.
    An utter disaster for the government, but it was great to see that scumbag Prescott hung out to dry by his beloved Humberside (well done East-Yorks and Lincs you did us all a favour), maybe he'll finally get the message.

    Also great that in Bristol, we got the indepedent we so desperately need.
     
     

  3. Re: 'Flagship' blown-out of the water! 
    #3
    Platinum Member Col's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    outside 'Nam
    Posts
    1,063
    Quote Originally Posted by monday21
    This hypocritical government could have spent the £100 million on this fiasco of so called elections on 3,000 police constables instead.
    Are you barking Ken :-?

    What the hell do we want more bloody plod for ? crying out loud we got enough on the payroll already at huge cost :

    I do agree it is a total waste of taxpayers money---as usual :'( see where they get 'a generous pension' wtf!!! it's a short term contract isn't it ? why do we have to provide a pension---will even have an assistant to ummmm make tea I guess :-/

    Incidentally bet you're happy to see a jock in the errrrr 'job' here ...he is a jock is he ? Angus mctavish or somat....nice to see one taken off the unemployeds list ;D ;D
    I need amusement in my sad life and it looks, very much, like you fit this requirement admirably..............begin the amusement!!!!!
     
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •