Notices
 

Thread: Handle bar end weights

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
  1. Re: Handle bar end weights 
    #11
    Diamond Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    3,338
    And there was me thinking they were there to keep the handle bar grips on. :P ;D
     
     

  2. Re: Handle bar end weights 
    #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    3,804
    I thought they were to protect your grips in case you bumped against a wall :P ;D
     
     

  3. Re: Handle bar end weights 
    #13
    Active Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    92
    So, where does the vibration actually resonate from? Is it an unbalanced crankshaft, bad engine management, tuning, design etc. Needs fixing whatever it is. :-/
     
     

  4. Re: Handle bar end weights 
    #14
    Diamond Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,610
    Quote Originally Posted by gibbo
    So, where does the vibration actually resonate from? Is it an unbalanced crankshaft, bad engine management, tuning, design etc. Needs fixing whatever it is. :-/
    I work on the basis that if BMW can't sort it then I certainly can't. Both bikes are well known for it and have been for decades. The trick is to ride faster
     
     

  5. Re: Handle bar end weights 
    #15
    Diamond Member Scotty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Fawley, New Forest
    Posts
    2,742
    An internal combustion engine is full of large heavy components that rotate or reciprocate - that's where the vibration emanates from - some engines are more inherently balanced than others - normal in-line 4 cylinder engines have perfect primary balance but imperfect secondary balance and give high frequency vibrations. (Cross-plane crank R1s lose the primary balance and have to run an additional balance shaft (that saps power) to compensate for it) Generally the fewer cylinders, the more vibration they make. Twins can be good or bad depending on the engine configuration; the best being BMW Boxers and 90º Vs like Ducatis, the worst being 45ºVs (Harleys) and 360º twins (old British bikes). Older singles are the worst of the lot... The smoothest bike engine is a 6-cylinder with 120º crank throws (Goldwing, Honda CBX, Kawasaki Z1300 etc.)

    Getting to the techy bit... The natural frequency (fn) of an object is calculated by the following formula: fn = [ch8730](k/m) which means that the frequency at which the object will resonate (its natural frequency) is the square root of its stiffness divided by its mass. By adding mass (a weight) to the handlebar, the Engineers reduce its natural frequency to one that is less likely to be obtrusive during use.

    Bike designers are extremely cost-conscious as they have accountants breathing down their necks constantly - Bar end weights are not aesthetically pleasing and couldn't be justified from that perspective. They're not for styling, they have a function. To engineer all vibration out of an internal combustion engine is possible, but not justifiable either economically or from the performance perspective. Car engines are isolated from the chassis by rubber mountings, on bikes we have to make do with bar end weights and rubber-mounted footrests in some cases...
    Racing is life, anything before or after is just waiting.
    Steve McQueen
     
     

  6. Re: Handle bar end weights 
    #16
    PR Officer Nelly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Chippenham
    Posts
    3,638
    Quote Originally Posted by Scotty
    An internal combustion engine is full of large heavy components that rotate or reciprocate - that's where the vibration emanates from - some engines are more inherently balanced than others - normal in-line 4 cylinder engines have perfect primary balance but imperfect secondary balance and give high frequency vibrations. (Cross-plane crank R1s lose the primary balance and have to run an additional balance shaft (that saps power) to compensate for it) Generally the fewer cylinders, the more vibration they make. Twins can be good or bad depending on the engine configuration; the best being BMW Boxers and 90º Vs like Ducatis, the worst being 45ºVs (Harleys) and 360º twins (old British bikes). Older singles are the worst of the lot... The smoothest bike engine is a 6-cylinder with 120º crank throws (Goldwing, Honda CBX, Kawasaki Z1300 etc.)

    Getting to the techy bit... The natural frequency (fn) of an object is calculated by the following formula: fn = [ch8730](k/m) which means that the frequency at which the object will resonate (its natural frequency) is the square root of its stiffness divided by its mass. By adding mass (a weight) to the handlebar, the Engineers reduce its natural frequency to one that is less likely to be obtrusive during use.

    Bike designers are extremely cost-conscious as they have accountants breathing down their necks constantly - Bar end weights are not aesthetically pleasing and couldn't be justified from that perspective. They're not for styling, they have a function. To engineer all vibration out of an internal combustion engine is possible, but not justifiable either economically or from the performance perspective. Car engines are isolated from the chassis by rubber mountings, on bikes we have to make do with bar end weights and rubber-mounted footrests in some cases...
    Blimey scotty! You swallowed a haynes manual?
    "the empty can rattles the most!"

    https://www.facebook.com/neil.hudd
     
     

  7. Re: Handle bar end weights 
    #17
    Diamond Member Scotty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Fawley, New Forest
    Posts
    2,742
    Nah mate, you wouldn't get anything that technical in a Haynes Manual... it's about the easiest formula I learnt at Uni
    Racing is life, anything before or after is just waiting.
    Steve McQueen
     
     

  8. Re: Handle bar end weights 
    #18
    Chatterbox Jon_W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Loacation Loaction
    Posts
    5,133
    How did you get the square root symbol and the sub script????

    Indeed, you do leave uni with a few thing embedded. The natural frequency equation is one of them.

    However, you need to consider transmissability in your equations as the bars are not directly coupled to the engine.
    "there's no aspect, no facet, no moment in life that can't be improved with pizza"

     
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •