Notices
 

Thread: V-Power Vs Standard

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. V-Power Vs Standard 
    #1
    Active Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    100
    Hi All,

    Since I got my 675 i've been putting shell V-power in it.
    Are there actually any benefits of doing this or am i simply wasting my money?

    I've heard it burns cleaner so it produces more power and is better for the engine etc..

    But what are the actual benefits?

    Andy :
     
     

  2. Re: V-Power Vs Standard 
    #2
    Platinum Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Hiding in your blindspot
    Posts
    1,687
    Less water in the fuel for sure, my old 9r used to carb ice with normal unleaded, but not with V power?!
     
     

  3. Re: V-Power Vs Standard 
    #3
    Diamond Member Scotty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Fawley, New Forest
    Posts
    2,742
    There is no water in petrol, carb-icing is due to atmospheric moisture condensing and freezing. Quite why your bike doesn't suffer icing when using a different fuel I can't explain, but it isn't due to water in the fuel.

    As for V-Power or other super unleaded fuels, I've never bothered with them personally, even for the track bike, but I'd be interested to read anyone's objective appraisal of a true comparison to see whether the additional cost is worth it.
    Racing is life, anything before or after is just waiting.
    Steve McQueen
     
     

  4. Re: V-Power Vs Standard 
    #4
    The Boss Dabz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Trowbridge, Wiltshire, United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,457
    I'd always read that uk vehicles are tuned for our standard 97(?) RON fuel so the 98/99 stuff isn't worth it unless you have something like a jap import. I suspect you'd be better saving the money and treating the bike to a service instead
    http://twitter.com/WiltshireBikers
    http://www.facebook.com/WiltshireBikers
     
     

  5. Re: V-Power Vs Standard 
    #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    3,804
    Yea like Dabz says if your bike isn't tuned to run on higher octane then you're just giving more money to the rip of oil companies
     
     

  6. Re: V-Power Vs Standard 
    #6
    Active Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    272
    not sure if its any different on bikes but I used to run my V6 Golf on it and I never noticed any difference, although I'm sure I heard the same as Dabz that the vehicle needs to be tuned for a higher octane.
     
     

  7. Re: V-Power Vs Standard 
    #7
    Diamond Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,087
    fuel (apart from the 100 or so other additives) is made up of :-
    a certain percentage of easily combustible material that "starts the fire" and a certain amount of fuel that "sustains the fire" (normally represented as a percentage of N heptane and Iso-octane for testing purposes).
    the "super plus/Vpower" is actually LESS easily combustible but MORE sustaining, meaning that you have to "squash" it more to get the benefits from it (you make it more volatile by increasing its temperature by squashing it more).
    your bike has a compression level set to utilise normal unleaded, and will NOT benefit (in most cases) from superplus/Vpower....

    there are exceptions, for instance, the short stroke/large bores of 1000cc v twins (honda SP1 for example) can benefit from a longer burning fuel, as it then burns completely right to the bore edges (which is a VERY long flame path compaired to a 600cc 4 cylinder!!!....(same revs = same time for both engines to burn the mixture).

    you generally wont see any difference on the road tho, youll just be wasting your money, unless you have an engine with an increased compression ratio or excessive boost pressure in turbo engines.
     
     

  8. Re: V-Power Vs Standard 
    #8
    Active Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    100
    Right. Thanks chaps.

    I won't bother with the extra cost from now on then!

    Ta
     
     

  9. Re: V-Power Vs Standard 
    #9
    Senior Member voodoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Trowvegas
    Posts
    646
    Quote Originally Posted by jonnydangerous
    you generally wont see any difference on the road tho, youll just be wasting your money, unless you have an engine with an increased compression ratio or excessive boost pressure in turbo engines.
    [smiley=thumbsup.gif] only ever used it in high power/boost turbo'd cars which were made for the jap market 100+ RON fuel. it's pretty much pointless buying it for 99.9% of the UK vehicle market
     
     

  10. Re: V-Power Vs Standard 
    #10
    Senior Member voodoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Trowvegas
    Posts
    646
    oh and even then you have to get it mapped for the different fuel to get any benefit
     
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •